Identification of putative 1p36 tumor suppressor genes involved in oligodendroglioma development

Oligodendrogliomas are primary neoplasms of the central nervous system (CNS). One of the most common and characteristic chromosomal abnormalities observed in oligodendroglioma is allelic loss of 1p (Reifenberger et al., 1994; Bello et al., 1995). Since 1p loss has been reported for both well-differentiated and anaplastic oligodendroglioma, it is believed to occur early in tumor development (Bello et al., 1995). This allelic loss also has clinical significance, for oligodendroglioma patients with 1p loss generally respond significantly better to combination chemotherapy and have longer average survival than do oligodendroglioma patients without 1p loss (Cairncross et al., 1998). To date, no genes on 1p have been implicated as essential to the development or treatment response of oligodendroglioma. In order to localize and/or identify a gene involved in oligodendroglioma development, I tested 170 oligodendrogliomas for deletions of 1p and tested 26 tumors for differential expression of genes in the region of 1p36. Evidence obtained from these methods implicated two genes, SHREW1 and the gene encoding DNA fragmentation factor beta (DFFB). The function for the SHREW1 locus is currently not well known, but preliminary data suggests that it a novel member of adherens junctions. The DFFB gene is an enhancer for apoptosis. Thus, both SHREW1 and DFFB may be candidates for an oligodendroglioma tumor suppressor. Mutational analysis of both genes did not uncover any mutations. Future studies will evaluate other mechanisms that may be responsible for inactivation of these genes in oligodendrogliomas. ^

Molecular mechanisms of prostacyclin receptor signaling: The intracellular domains in G protein coupling

To better understand the mechanisms of how the human prostacyclin receptor (1P) mediates vasodilation and platelet anti-aggregation through Gs protein coupling, a strategy integrating multiple approaches including high resolution NMR experiments, synthetic peptide, fluorescence spectroscopy, molecular modeling, and recombinant protein was developed and used to characterize the structure/function relationship of important segments and residues of the IP receptor and the α-subunit of the Gs protein (Gαs). The first (iLP1) and third (iLP3) intracellular loops of the IP receptor, as well as the Gαs C-terminal domain, relevant to the Gs-mediated IP receptor signaling, were first identified by observation of the effects of the mini gene-expressed corresponding protein segments in HEK293 cells which co-expressed the receptor and Gαs. Evidence of the IP iLP1 domain interacted with the Gαs C-terminal domain was observed by fluorescence and NMR spectroscopic studies using a constrained synthetic peptide, which mimicked the IP iLP1 domain, and the synthetic peptide, which mimicked Gαs C-terminal domain. The solution structural models and the peptide-peptide interaction of the two synthetic protein segments were determined by high resolution NMR spectroscopy. The important residues in the corresponding domains of the IP receptor and the Gαs predicted by NMR chemical shift mapping were used to guide the identification of their protein-protein interaction in cells. A profile of the residues Arg42 - Ala48 of the IP iLP1 domain and the three residues Glu392 ∼ Leu394 of the Gαs C-terminal domain involved in the IP/Gs protein coupling were confirmed by recombinant proteins. The data revealed an intriguing speculation on the mechanisms of how the signal of the ligand-activated IP receptor is transmitted to the Gs protein in regulating vascular functions and homeostasis, and also provided substantial insights into other prostanoid receptor signaling. ^

Identification and characterization of cellular genes differentially expressed in a subset of tumors with non -functional WT1

Wilms tumor (WT) or nephroblastoma is a genetically heterogeneous pediatric renal tumor that accounts for 6–7% of all childhood cancers in the U.S. WT1, located at 11p13, is the sole WT gene cloned to date. Additional genomic regions containing genes that play a role in the development of Wilms tumor include 11p15, 7p, 16q, 1p, 17q and 19q. This heterogeneity has made it extremely difficult to develop an understanding of the pathways involved in the development of WT, even in the 5–20% of tumors that show mutations at the WT1 locus. My research addresses this gap in our current comprehension of the development of WT. ^ I have used two complementary approaches to extend the current understanding of molecular changes involved in the development of WT. In order to minimize complexities due to genetic heterogeneity, I confined my analysis to the WT1 pathway by assessing those genetically defined tumors that carry WT1 mutations. WT1 encodes a zinc finger transcription factor, and in vitro studies have identified many genes that are potentially regulated in vivo by WT1. However, there is very little in vivo data that suggests that they are transcriptionally regulated endogenously by WT1. In one approach I assessed the role of WT1 in the in vivo regulation of PDGFA and IGF2, two genes that are strong contenders for endogenous regulation by WT1. Using primary tissue samples, I found no correlation between the level of RNA expression of WT1 with either PDGFA or IGF2, suggesting that WT1 does not play a critical role in their expression in either normal kidney or WT. ^ In a parallel strategy, using differential display analysis I compared global gene expression in a subset of tumors with known homozygous inactivating WT1 mutations (WT1-tumors) to the gene expression in a panel of appropriate control tissues (fetal kidney, normal kidney, rhabdoid tumor and pediatric renal cell carcinoma). Transcripts that are aberrantly expressed in this subset of Wilms tumors are candidates for endogenous transcriptional regulation by WT1 as well as for potentially functioning in the development of WT. By this approach I identified several differentially expressed transcripts. I further characterized two of these transcripts, identifying a candidate WT gene in the process. I then performed a detailed analysis of this WT candidate gene, which maps to 7p. Future studies will shed more light on the role of these differentially expressed genes in WT. ^

The role of platelet -derived growth factor (PDGF) signaling in gliomagenesis

Gliomas are primary central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms that are believed to arise from astrocytes, oligodendrocytes or their precursors. Gliomas can be classified into two major histopathological groups: oligodendroglial and astroglial tumors. The most malignant of the astroglial tumors is glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). A great deal of genetic and epigenetic alterations have been implicated in gliomagenesis. In particular, PDGF signaling is frequently over-activated in a large number of human gliomas. In order to gain insights into the biology of gliomas, we manage to model human gliomas in mice using a somatic gene transfer approach—RCAS/TVA system. In our previous study, combined activation of AKT and RAS pathways gave rise to glioblastomas from CNS progenitors. In the present study, we demonstrate that in vivo autocrine PDGF stimulation induces oligodendrogliomas and mixed oligoastrocytomas from CNS progenitors and differentiated astrocytes respectively. In culture autocrine PDGF stimulation dedifferentiates astrocytes into progenitor-like cells and blockade of PDGF signaling reverses these phenotypic changes. Experimental disruption of cell cycle arrest pathway, such as Ink4a-Arf loss, is not required for the initiation of PDGF-induced gliomagenesis; instead, this mutation contributes to the tumor progression by enhancing tumor malignancy and shortening tumor latency. P53 deficiency does not promote the PDGF-induced gliomagenesis. In addition, 1p and 19q, often deleted in human oligodendrogliomas, remain intact in these PDGF-induced gliomas. Therefore, our studies suggest that autocrine PDGF stimulation alone may be sufficient to induce gliomagenesis. In contrast to transient stimulation in vitro, constitutive PDGF stimulation activates neither AKT nor RAS/MAPK pathways during gliomagenesis. This results in the formation of oligodendrogliomas, instead of glioblastomas. Sustained activation of the AKT pathway converts PDGF-induced oligodendrogliomas into astrocytomas. Our studies suggest that constitutive PDGF stimulation is not equivalent to transient PDGF stimulation, and that a transition between oligodendroglial and astroglial tumors in humans may be possible, depending on additional alterations. In summary, PDGF signaling plays a pivotal role in gliomagenesis in the mouse, and its hyperactivity is capable of contributing to both oligodendroglial and astroglial tumorigenesis. ^